Comments for The Cineman ::: Redux http://thecineman.baywords.com Capsulized Reviews by Phil Calabro Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:33:56 +0100 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 Comment on The Twilight Saga: New Moon (2009) by Phil Calabro http://thecineman.baywords.com/2009/11/20/the-twilight-saga-new-moon-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-12 Phil Calabro Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:33:56 +0000 http://thecineman.baywords.com/?p=161#comment-12 Taylor Lautner plays it natural, basically. He's got this whole good-ole-boy attitude, it works well considering the rest of the characters are pretty flat. Why review New Moon? Why not? It's got cultural significance, and now having actually seen it, I'll have a more formulated opinion on it - even if it's negative. I don't like judging books by their cover. Taylor Lautner plays it natural, basically. He’s got this whole good-ole-boy attitude, it works well considering the rest of the characters are pretty flat.

Why review New Moon? Why not? It’s got cultural significance, and now having actually seen it, I’ll have a more formulated opinion on it – even if it’s negative. I don’t like judging books by their cover.

]]> Comment on The Twilight Saga: New Moon (2009) by Miles Colella http://thecineman.baywords.com/2009/11/20/the-twilight-saga-new-moon-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-11 Miles Colella Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:23:33 +0000 http://thecineman.baywords.com/?p=161#comment-11 vanilla veracity? what exactly do you mean by that? I haven't seen New Moon, but it sounds about right. But why even bother watching something like this, let alone reviewing it? vanilla veracity? what exactly do you mean by that?

I haven’t seen New Moon, but it sounds about right. But why even bother watching something like this, let alone reviewing it?

]]> Comment on G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra (2009) by Miles http://thecineman.baywords.com/2009/08/19/g-i-joe-the-rise-of-cobra/comment-page-1/#comment-2 Miles Tue, 08 Sep 2009 07:51:29 +0000 http://thecineman.baywords.com/?p=17#comment-2 Hey man, it's good to see you're still doing reviews. That's some good analysis, though. I agree about the dialogue, it was terrible, not even the good kind of cheesy (what happened to the Con Air's of the 90s?). The action was better than I thought, entertaining to say the least. It was those random, sporadic flashbacks that annoyed me. They came out of nowhere, and to me, didnt seem to add much depth to the characters. I was also disappointed that they underutilized Dennis Quaid, he's the man. Hey man, it’s good to see you’re still doing reviews. That’s some good analysis, though. I agree about the dialogue, it was terrible, not even the good kind of cheesy (what happened to the Con Air’s of the 90s?). The action was better than I thought, entertaining to say the least.

It was those random, sporadic flashbacks that annoyed me. They came out of nowhere, and to me, didnt seem to add much depth to the characters. I was also disappointed that they underutilized Dennis Quaid, he’s the man.

]]>